首页> 外文OA文献 >Unglaciated areas in East Antarctica during the Last Glacial (Marine Isotope Stage 3)–New evidence from Rauer Group
【2h】

Unglaciated areas in East Antarctica during the Last Glacial (Marine Isotope Stage 3)–New evidence from Rauer Group

机译:最后一次冰河期(海洋同位素第3阶段)东极南极的无冰川地区-Rauer Group的新证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Limited information on the East Antarctic Ice Sheet (EAIS) geometry during Marine Isotope Stage 3 (MIS 3; 60-25 ka) restricts our understanding of its behaviour during periods of climate and sea level change. Ice sheet models forced by global parameters suggest an expanded EAIS compared to the Holocene during MIS 3, but field evidence from East Antarctic coastal areas contradicts such modelling, and suggests that the ice sheet margins were no more advanced than at present. Here we present a new lake sediment record, and cosmogenic exposure results from bedrock, which confirm that Rauer Group (eastern Prydz Bay) was ice-free for much of MIS 3. We also refine the likely duration of the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) glaciation in the region.Lacustrine and marine sediments from Rauer Group indicate the penultimate period of ice retreat predates 50 ka. The lacustrine record indicates a change from warmer/wetter conditions to cooler/drier conditions after ca. 35 ka. Substantive ice sheet re-advance, however, may not have occurred until much closer to 20 ka.Contemporary coastal areas were still connected to the sea during MIS 3, restricting the possible extent of grounded ice in Prydz Bay on the continental shelf. In contrast, relative sea levels (RSL) deduced from field evidence indicate an extra ice load averaging several hundred metres thicker ice across the Bay between 45 and 32 ka. Thus, ice must either have been thicker immediately inland (with a steeper ice profile), or there were additional ice domes on the shallow banks of the outer continental shelf. Further work is required to reconcile the differences between empirical evidence of past ice sheet histories, and the history predicted by ice sheet models from far-field temperature and sea level records. © 2016, Elsevier Ltd.
机译:海洋同位素第3阶段(MIS 3; 60-25 ka)期间有关南极冰盖(EAIS)几何形状的信息有限,这限制了我们对其在气候和海平面变化期间的行为的了解。受全球参数强迫的冰盖模型表明,与MIS 3期间的全新世相比,EAIS有所扩展,但是来自南极东部沿海地区的实地证据与这种建模相矛盾,并且表明冰盖边缘的发展程度不比目前高。在这里,我们提供了一个新的湖泊沉积物记录,以及基岩的宇宙成因暴露结果,这证实了大部分MIS 3的Rauer Group(东部Prydz湾)都是无冰的。 Rauer Group的湖相和海洋沉积物表明倒冰的倒数第二阶段早于50 ka。湖水记录表明,经过大约30分钟后,从较温暖/较冷的条件变为较冷/较干燥的条件。 35 ka。但是,直到20 ka左右才可能发生大范围的冰盖再行进.MIS 3期间,当代沿海地区仍与海连接,限制了大陆架普莱兹湾的碎冰可能性。相反,根据实地证据推算出的相对海平面(RSL)表示,在45至32 ka之间,整个海湾的平均冰层平均增加了数百米。因此,内陆的冰层一定要立即变厚(具有陡峭的冰面),或者在外大陆架的浅岸上还有另外的冰穹。需要做进一步的工作来调和过去冰盖历史的经验证据与冰盖模型根据远场温度和海平面记录预测的历史之间的差异。 ©2016,爱思唯尔有限公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号